property division and fraud in Texas divorce

Understanding the complexities of divorce and property division under Texas Family Code is essential for anyone going through these processes. This article outlines the legal distinctions between community and separate properties, how assets are divided, and the impact of fraud on these procedures.

Community vs. Separate Property: Legal Definitions and Burdens of Proof

Statutory Definitions

The Texas Family Code requires that the division of the community estate in a divorce be “just and right”, considering each party’s rights and any children involved. The Code states:

“In a divorce decree, the trial court must order a division of the community estate in a manner that the court deems just and right, having due regard for the rights of each party and any children of the marriage.” (TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 7.001)

Key classifications include:

  • Community Property: All property acquired during the marriage, unless defined as separate property.” Community property consists of the property, other than separate property, acquired by either spouse during marriage.” (TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 3.002)
  • Separate Property: Assets owned or claimed before marriage, and those acquired by gift, devise, or descent.” Separate property is defined as, among other things, the property owned or claimed by the spouse before marriage.” (TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 3.001(1))

Evidence and Burden of Proof

For a fair division of the community estate, sufficient evidence of the value of the properties must be presented by the spouses. This is crucial as:

“Each spouse bears the burden to present sufficient evidence of the value of the community estate to enable the trial court to make a just and right division.” (Kelly v. Kelly, 634 S.W.3d 335, 348 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2021, no pet.))

Case Law on Property Division: In-depth Analysis

Factors Influencing Disproportionate Division

The courts can order an asset division that is fair based on various factors, not necessarily equal:

“This standard may at times lead to a disproportionate division of assets and liabilities of the parties, depending on the circumstances that courts may consider in refusing to divide the marital estate equally.” (Schlueter v. Schlueter, 975 S.W.2d 584, 588 (Tex. 1998))

Relevant factors include spouses’ capacities, benefits lost due to the marriage, and the nature of the property. (Murff v. Murff, 615 S.W.2d 696, 698–99 (Tex. 1981))

Tracing and Rebutting Community Property Presumption

Establishing Separate Property

Challenging the presumption of community property requires clear evidence:

“Property possessed by either spouse during or on dissolution of marriage is presumed to be community property. To rebut the community property presumption, a party must prove the property is separate property by clear and convincing evidence.” (TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 3.003(a-b))

“The party seeking to rebut the community property presumption must trace the assets on hand during the marriage back to property that is separate in character.” (Cockerham v. Cockerham, 527 S.W.2d 162, 167 (Tex. 1975))

Fraud and Reimbursement Claims in Divorce Proceedings

Reimbursement Rights and Equitable Claims

Reimbursement may be claimed if one spouse’s separate property is enhanced at the community’s expense:

“A party is entitled to reimbursement to his or her marital estate when community time, talent and labor are utilized to benefit and enhance a spouse’s separate estate, beyond whatever care, attention, and expenditure are necessary for the proper maintenance and preservation of the separate estate, without the community receiving adequate compensation.” (Vallone v. Vallone, 644 S.W.2d 455, 459 (Tex. 1982))

Addressing Fraud on the Community

Actual or constructive fraud impacts how the community estate is divided:

“If the trier of fact determines that a spouse has committed actual or constructive fraud on the community, the court shall: calculate the value by which the community estate was depleted as a result of the fraud on the community and calculate the amount of the reconstituted estate; and divide the value of the reconstituted estate between the parties in a manner the court deems just and right.” (TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 7.009(b))

A reconstituted estate refers to the total value of the community estate as it would have existed if no fraud had occurred. This concept involves adjusting the current value of the community assets to reflect what they would have been without any fraudulent depletion. By doing this, the court ensures that the division of assets compensates the wronged party for losses incurred due to the other spouse’s fraudulent actions and restores equity to the division process.

Differentiating Between Actual and Constructive Fraud

Actual fraud involves intentional deception, whereas constructive fraud may occur without intent, typically due to a breach of duty that results in an unfair advantage:

“Actual fraud involves dishonesty of purpose or intent to deceive, whereas constructive fraud typically involves a breach of legal or equitable duty that, although not involving dishonesty of intent, results in an unfair advantage to one spouse at the expense of the other.” (Jean v. Tyson-Jean, 118 S.W.3d 1, 9 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied))

Differentiating Between Actual and Constructive Fraud

Actual fraud involves intentional deception, whereas constructive fraud may occur without intent, typically due to a breach of duty that results in an unfair advantage:

“Actual fraud involves dishonesty of purpose or intent to deceive, whereas constructive fraud typically involves a breach of legal or equitable duty that, although not involving dishonesty of intent, results in an unfair advantage to one spouse at the expense of the other.” (Jean v. Tyson-Jean, 118 S.W.3d 1, 9 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied))

Legal Remedies and Trusts in Cases of Fraud

Constructive Trusts and Equitable Relief

Constructive trusts are imposed to prevent profit from wrongful acts:

“A constructive trust is a creation of equity intended to prevent a wrongdoer from profiting from his wrongful acts.” (Freeman v. Harleton Oil & Gas, Inc., 528 S.W.3d 708, 733 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2017, pet. denied))

The court can also provide legal or equitable relief necessary for a fair division:

“In making a just and right division of the reconstituted estate, the court may grant any legal or equitable relief necessary, including awarding to the wronged spouse an appropriate share of the community estate remaining after the actual or constructive fraud on the community and/or awarding a money judgment in favor of the wronged spouse against the spouse who committed the actual or constructive fraud on the community.” (TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 7.009(c))

Conclusion

The Texas Family Code provides structured guidelines for addressing divorce and property division,  constructive and actual fraud, reconstituting the community estate and reimbursement claims ensuring fair outcomes for all parties involved.

To retain an experienced Texas divorce lawyer for your divorce or child custody case in DallasDentonCollin or Rockwall County, please schedule a consultation with us today.